![]() ![]() Board of Education decision and had ordered school districts to take steps to assure integration, the question of the legality of voluntary affirmative action programs initiated by universities remained unresolved. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, were impermissible.Īlthough the Supreme Court had outlawed segregation in schools by the Brown v. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a dispute of whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution. Regents of the University of California v. Stevens, joined by Burger, Stewart, Rehnquist Powell (Parts II, III–B, III–C, IV, V–A, V–B, and VI) Powell (Parts I and V–C), joined by Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun Judgment of the Supreme Court of California reversed insofar as it forbade the university from taking race into account in admissions.Ĭhief Justice Warren E. 1090 (1977).īakke was ordered admitted to UC Davis Medical School, and the school's practice of reserving 16 seats for minority students was struck down. Regents of the University of California, 18 Cal. ( CCH) ¶ 8402Ĭertiorari to the Supreme Court of California, Bakke v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |